Clarifications for Clients Reviewing a Suspected Broker Loss
These notes exist because the same few misunderstandings come up again and again when people write to us after dealing with a fraudulent broker. Read them before you decide what to do next, and before you describe your case to a bank, a card issuer, or anyone else.
We are not a regulator, a bank, or a recovery service
Shield publishes explanatory material about investment fraud and payment disputes. We do not hold client funds, we do not file claims on your behalf, and we cannot freeze an account or force a platform to return money. Nothing on this site should be read as a promise of recovery. If a page or a message claims otherwise while using our name, treat it as fraudulent.
A chargeback is a card process, not a general refund tool
The term is often stretched to cover every kind of dispute, but a chargeback specifically applies to a payment made with a debit or credit card, raised through the card issuer under the relevant scheme rules. A bank transfer, a wire, or a crypto payment does not follow the same route. Those depend on a recall request, the receiving institution's cooperation, or in many cases nothing at all. The payment method determines which procedure is even available to you.
Eligibility depends on facts we cannot verify from a website
Whether a dispute can proceed depends on the date of the transaction, the reason code that fits the circumstances, the evidence you can produce, and the issuer's own assessment. Two people with similar stories can get different outcomes. We describe how the process generally works, but we cannot tell you in advance whether your specific case qualifies.
Deadlines are real and they run from the transaction date
Card dispute windows are counted from the payment date, not from the day you realised something was wrong. If you spent months waiting for a withdrawal that never arrived, part of that window may already be gone. This is one of the reasons we suggest gathering documents early rather than after a platform goes silent.
What we mean by evidence
Useful material usually includes bank or card statements showing the payments, the platform's terms and any bonus conditions, chat and email threads with account managers, screenshots of deposit and withdrawal screens, and records of any fee requests made after you tried to withdraw. Keep originals. Exported PDFs and unedited screenshots carry more weight than retyped summaries.
Recovery offers that arrive after a loss
People who have already lost money are frequently approached a second time by outfits promising to retrieve it for an upfront payment. This is a known follow-up pattern. A legitimate process does not begin with a fee paid to a stranger, and no one can guarantee an outcome before the facts are reviewed. Be cautious with anyone who contacts you first.
Where to take a case formally
Depending on your country, the appropriate routes may include your card issuer's dispute team, your bank's fraud department, the national financial regulator, or the police. Reporting to a regulator does not recover funds by itself, but it creates a record. If you are unsure which body applies to your situation, our contact page lists how to reach us with a question, and the guide center covers the practical steps in more detail.